RG213 vs LMR400 Coaxial Cable Complete Comparison Guide

By RG213 vs LMR400 7218

RG213 vs LMR400 Coaxial Cable Complete Comparison Guide

What is RG213?

What is LMR400?

Main Differences Between RG213 and LMR400

Common Application Scenarios

Electrical Performance Comparison

Physical Property Comparison

How to Choose Between RG213 and LMR400?

Pros and Cons Summary

Frequently Asked Questions

 

 

What is RG213?

 

Basic Introduction

 

RG213 is a 50-ohm coaxial cable. It is widely used in amateur radio, broadcast transmission, and base station communication. Its design follows the MIL-C-17 military standard. It is known for high durability and reliability. Many traditional radio systems use it as the standard feeder cable.

 

Main Features

 

RG213 usually uses stranded tinned copper wires (multi-wire copper with tin coating) as the conductor. This makes it more resistant to corrosion and more flexible. The insulation is solid polyethylene (PE), which gives stable electrical performance. The shielding is aluminum foil plus a high-density tinned copper braid (net), with more than 95% coverage. The outer jacket is PVC, which is flame-retardant, wear-resistant, and weatherproof.

 

What is LMR400?

 

Basic Introduction

 

LMR400 is a 50-ohm coaxial cable made by Times Microwave Systems. It is a low-loss and flexible modern coaxial cable design. It is often used as an upgrade replacement for RG8 or RG213. With similar size, it offers better high-frequency performance.

 

Main Features

 

LMR400 uses a solid copper conductor. This lowers resistance. Its insulation is physical-foamed polyethylene (foamed PE), which reduces signal loss. The shielding is aluminum foil and copper braid, and some models even use triple shielding. The outer jacket can be PVC or LSZH (low smoke zero halogen) for different environments.

 

Main Differences Between RG213 and LMR400

Feature RG213 LMR400
Design Age Traditional design Modern design
Insulation Material Solid polyethylene Foamed polyethylene
Loss Level Higher Much lower
Flexibility Normal, stiff Better
Weight Heavier Lighter
Cost Lower Higher

 

Common Application Scenarios

 

Use of RG213

 

RG213 is often used in HF (high frequency) and VHF (very high frequency) amateur radio, FM broadcasting, and short base station connections. Its strong structure and good shielding make it suitable for fixed installation projects with limited budget.

 

Use of LMR400

 

LMR400 is better for UHF (ultra high frequency) and higher bands, such as cellular networks, GMRS radios, Wi-Fi extension, and professional wireless systems. Its low-loss feature is very useful for long-distance and high-frequency transmission.

 

Electrical Performance Comparison

 

Attenuation Comparison

 

The following are attenuation values per 100 feet (unit: dB):

Frequency RG213 LMR400
100 MHz 1.6 dB 1.3 dB
400 MHz 3.4 dB 2.2 dB
1000 MHz 5.9 dB 3.8 dB
2400 MHz 9.8 dB 6.5 dB

From the data, as frequency goes higher, the low-loss advantage of LMR400 becomes more clear.

 

Other Electrical Parameters

 

Both have 50-ohm impedance. RG213 has a rated voltage of about 5000V, while LMR400 is about 2700V. Their capacitance is similar, around 20–21 pF/ft.

 

Physical Property Comparison

Feature RG213 LMR400
Outer Diameter About 10.3 mm About 10.3 mm
Min. Bend Radius Larger Smaller
Weight About 95 kg/1000ft About 74 kg/1000ft
Temp. Range -40°C ~ +85°C -55°C ~ +85°C
Waterproof Good Excellent (most models)

 

How to Choose Between RG213 and LMR400?

 

When to Choose RG213

 

Choose RG213 if your project has a low budget and works at lower frequencies (HF or VHF). It is also better for fixed installations where mechanical strength and durability are important.

 

When to Choose LMR400

 

Choose LMR400 if your system works at UHF or microwave bands, or if you need long-distance signal transmission. Its better flexibility also helps in complex wiring.

 

Pros and Cons Summary

 

Pros and Cons of RG213

 

Pros:

  • Lower cost, easy to buy.
  • Strong mechanical strength, good shielding.
  • Works well in traditional radio systems.

Cons:

  • Higher loss at high frequency.
  • Heavier and less flexible.

 

Pros and Cons of LMR400

 

Pros:

  • Low loss at high frequency, better efficiency.
  • Lighter weight, small bend radius, easy to install.
  • Excellent waterproof and shielding.

Cons:

  • Higher price than RG213.
  • Slightly weaker mechanical strength compared to solid insulation cables.

 

Frequently Asked Questions

 

What is RG213?

Designed for high-frequency signal transmission, the 50-ohm RG213 coaxial cable provides robust performance as an antenna feedline for amateur radio operators and various RF system deployments.

 

What is the RG equivalent of LMR-400?

While RG-8 is the equivalent coaxial cable to LMR-400 in terms of size and general performance, LMR-400 is distinguished by its superior attenuation characteristics (lower loss).

 

What is RG213 used for?

RG213 finds widespread application in high-frequency signal transmission, particularly within amateur radio, CB radio, and various communication systems.​

 

What is the difference between RG213 and RG214?

The RG214 coaxial cable is constructed with a silver-plated copper core and a dual-layer shield of silver-plated copper braid. Its overall outer diameter measures 10.8 mm. In contrast, the RG213 utilizes a bare copper conductor with a single bare copper braid shield and has a smaller outer diameter of 10.3 mm.

Categorie

Top